Being Cross-centered has been a very popular expression the past few years. Not only is it popular, but it is charged with some explosive, transformative teaching that I believe every Christian should avail themselves to. Paul said he had made the decision to know nothing among the Corinthians, but Jesus Christ and him crucified. (See 1 Cor. 2:2)
The beloved apostle was communicating a very powerful message to the Corinthian believers because they needed something better than what they had. They needed a better understanding of the Cross of Christ.
I suppose if First Corinthians was all we had of Paul’s writings we could make a strong case for the Cross-centered life. But Paul’s theology is more robust than just being Cross-centered.
As a former Cross-centered fanatic, there was always a tension between me and my resurrection fanatics that I could not really settle in my soul. The solution for me was to choose to be Cross-centered 51-weeks out of the year and then be resurrection-centered on Easter Sunday.
This appeased the doctrinal tension only slightly because on Easter Sunday I felt as though I was not thinking highly enough of the Cross.
Over the past few months I have been coming into a fuller awareness that the tension between the Cross and the resurrection is really an artificial tension that does not need to exist. In Paul’s theology it was not an either/or doctrinal choice. Paul was Cross-centered AND resurrection-centered. Both of these strong doctrinal, Christological ideas are best found articulated and folded into the term “Gospel-Centered.”
To say that Paul was primarily Cross-centered truncates his comprehensive theological understanding and practical outworking of the complete Gospel in his life. To say that Paul was resurrection-centered does similarly. It would be more accurate to say that Paul was Gospel-centered. This term removes the artificial tension that could exist between the Cross-centered and resurrection-centered groups.
Christ is not just about the Cross and the Tomb
Gospel-centered goes even further than the Cross and the Tomb. The term Gospel communicates our understanding of the person and work of Christ from eternity past to eternity future. It is all that Christ was and all that he will be. The word Gospel is far better.
In First Corinthians Paul was very clear that he decided to know nothing, but Jesus Christ and him crucified. However, in Second Corinthians Paul’s focus in chapter one was on the resurrection of Christ. It was his understanding of the resurrection of Christ NOT the Cross of Christ that helped him through one of the more difficult times of his life.
Being Gospel-centered opens all the vistas of the Savior (past, present and future) and brings more power and dimensions to any situational difficulty. The Gospel offers me hope as I learn about the pre-incarnate Savior who planned my salvation. (See Eph. 1:3-10) The Gospel unfolds the crucified Savior to me as I wrestle through personal suffering and the need for redemption. Or it may be more appropriate to bring the resurrected Savior to bear when I’m despondent or depressed. And still yet, the Gospel brings encouragement to me when my longing is for the ruling Savior in eternity future.
Paul was more than Cross-centered. Paul was Gospel-centered. The more I have come into a better and fuller understanding of this Gospel, the more I have grown in my sanctification. The tension between the Cross and the Tomb does not exist for me. Thankfully, neither have been reduced in my thinking, but both are coexisting in an explosive and transformative way.
Read this article on how Paul thought through the resurrection in order to give him hope during one of the most difficult times in his life.
Checkout some of our training videos on our YouTube Channel










